nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

CloudEventV10Event definition

David Zeidman

On the webhook tutorial it gives the CloudEventV10Event class definition. Specifically it defines the source property as a Uri. However the documentation (CloudEvents schema on the overview page) then goes on to say that the source is a string and an example of which is "OAWVIVCLINWGMTCQJN".

However when I attempt to create such an object for manually testing my endpoint, It says that that value is not a valid URI (which it is not).

Not sure what gives here. Should it be a string or a URI?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Steven Cinquegrana

Hi David,

It's a string as per the example ("OAWUEUDHKJZVOR32GJKS2LLXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"), not a URI.

The spec on source seems to be fairly loose, with examples including - but not limited to - URNs and UUIDs:


• Internet-wide unique URI with a DNS authority.
https://github.com/cloudevents
    mailto:cncf-wg-serverless@lists.cncf.io
• Universally-unique URN with a UUID:
    urn:uuid:6e8bc430-9c3a-11d9-9669-0800200c9a66
• Application-specific identifiers
    /cloudevents/spec/pull/123
    /sensors/tn-1234567/alerts
    1-555-123-4567

Cheers,

Steve Cinquegrana | CEO and Principal Developer | Protégé Solutions

David Zeidman

Hi Steve,

I figured it was a string but Blackbaud's class definition should be updated in that case as it is defined in their tutorial code (bottom of step 1) as a Uri.

Thanks

David

Steven Cinquegrana

You mean this?:


    <span>// Event source</span><br/>    <span>[</span><span>JsonProperty</span><span>(</span>PropertyName <span>=</span> <span>"source"</span><span>)</span><span>]</span><br/>    <span>public</span> <u><span>Uri</span></u> Source <span>{</span> <span>get</span><span>;</span> <span>set</span><span>;</span> <span>}</span>

Yes, expect it should be:


    <span>public</span> <u><span>string</span></u> Source <span>{</span> <span>get</span><span>;</span> <span>set</span><span>;</span> <span>}</span>

in the general case to accommodate the broad spec.

David Zeidman

Yes, exactly that.