PowerUp Challenge: First Product Update Briefing Feedback Task

• I definitely preferred the change to the 60 minute format. As someone with a really busy schedule, its hard to find time for a 90 minute session. I do think that there could be value to the 90 minute format, if people are interested in it though. I am wondering if maybe there could be 2 briefings, one 60 minute one and one 90 minute one. Then, people can choose which option works better for them. While I find it hard to fit in a 90 minute briefing into my schedule, I could see myself making the time were I to find the product to be interesting or important to my work.

I appreciated the 60-minute length. I also don't have much spare time during the work week for webinars, but I like to fit them in when I can. If they're an hour long, I'm much more likely to be able to watch them.

I think the information provided during the webinar was more than enough to fill an hour. There were some features announced in the webinar that I think could use their own discussion of some kind, though. I did, however, appreciate the team fitting in time for quick live demos.

I like the 60-minute format, but if 90-minute webinars returned, I'd do my best to fit them in—at the very least, watch them back.

I feel that this change is good. An hour and a half was a long time and I don't think everything really sunk in as a result. The right balance was provided but I think it would be helpful if each speaker presented in the same format showing a single slide of what has already been implement and then continuing on with the roadmap. I'd prefer leaving it at a 60-minute format and possibly providing more detailed information as a downloadable document for those wanting more in-depth information.

I don't have any strong feelings about the change in format - 60 mins or 90 mins, both have been ok for me.

I think the 60 minute session did mean that there was less lingering on features that have already been added to RE like Miki mentioned and with less time available, there probably wasn't the temptation to put lots of demo videos in which I preferred.

I don't know if I would prefer going back to the 90 minute session, but I would definitely like for any follow-up scheduled town hall/demo sessions about new features that are mentioned to be signposted in an email to viewers along with the Q&A answers

I definitely prefer the 90 minute format. I felt the 60 minute session was a little rushed. I understand that people have trouble blocking the calendar for 90 minutes, so perhaps you need to rethink PUBs and have a Part 1 and 2 of 45 minutes each? I did appreciate the focus on future enhancements but it's frustrating to learn of them but not get a implementation time that is more specific. I feel it's more of a "teaser" especially when something is announced but then is walked back

I prefered the longer format, which allowed more time to absorb what was being presented, as the 60 minute format felt rushed. The longer format also allowed those of us attending the "Watch Party" to interact without feeling rushed or missing any content. I would definitely prefer going back to the 90 minute format.

I liked the change, especially this time of year. Sixty minutes felt more manageable for my calendar. I think it provided the right balance of information, and I think having a live follow-up meeting, like what Prenger did, in which we had the chance to ask our questions, was incredibly helpful. I would like to ask that the slides be made available as a download after the meeting. Not only for the QR codes to participate in the early adopter programs, but for content in general. The summary docs that were available for download during the presentation were helpful, but sometimes the slides just work better for me.

While I prefer 60 for my personal schedule, it was a lot of info very quickly. Did like that less time seemed to be spent on charts of what already done.

Yes, to having slides available.

I appreciate the difficulty in finding time for more than 60 minutes, but I did find the information in this PUB felt very rushed and skipped details that I could have used. I agree with the suggestion above to split this into two separate updates, especially if particular pieces of the product can be assigned to each PUB.

It's tough - 60 is the right amount of time, but 90 gives the right amount of content. I'd rather have two detailed ones, rather than one where it doesn't dive deeply enough. A compromise could be a 60 with a very good follow up summary with links for more information on the pieces we are particularly interested in.

I am fine with either but I would give a slight advantage to the 90 minute version as I do like the additional details and the 60 minute version seems a little rushed for the volume of content. The Prenger Solutions Q&A session a few days after was also very helpful. I hope those continue to happen. As others have mentioned, having the presentation slides at the time of the update would be helpful for note taking.