Pros & cons of not using start & end dates for Campaigns, Funds & Appeals
Hi,
Request by upper management to change structure of campaigns, funds, and appeals from the current FY setup, with start/end dates to perpetual ones without start or end dates. Concerned about effects on all queries, reports, overall data integrity, etc. Looking for information on the pros/cons of such a change. Large database with over 30 year history.
Comments
-
@Susan Raymer The pros and cons just come down to preference. You will have to change your report structure and query setup going forward, but FY gifts can easily be calculated by gift dates. This does make the CFA structure cleaner and removes FY maintenance (ie. inactivating older CFA, creating new FY CFA). It also removes online giving page maintenance, as those values will stay the same.
The hardest part is changing your mindset about it. You and your team will have to get comfortable with a new query model, and creating new reports may create some time, but these changes aren't the biggest deal in the world.
I wouldn't alter the historical gifts, just giving going forward. Granted, this can make reporting on historical gifts much different due to the changes in CFA.
4 -
@Susan Raymer
CFAP structure change is a major change. So first what is the reason for this change? There has to be a problem you are trying to solve to warrant this change.in my opinion.. having start and end date for CFAP does not make much sense or does it have much benefits.
2 -
@Alex Wong Thank you for your comments. The reason is preference not functionality. I happen to think it keeps CFA much cleaner and neater as they are not neccessarily consistant year to year. Also, the request will be at least somewhat historical. And given the age of the database, plus the fact that we merged with another organization that had an entirely different CFA structure, it will cause significant changes and issues with queries, etc that will take considerable time to readjust accurately.
1 -
Hi,
Request by upper management to change structure of campaigns, funds, and appeals from the current FY setup, with start/end dates to perpetual ones without start or end dates. Concerned about effects on all queries, reports, overall data integrity, etc. Looking for information on the pros/cons of such a change. Large database with over 30 year history.
Agree that it is largely preference but there is rarely a good reason to set up Funds for each year. I've seen a lot of interesting gift coding though, so won't say “never”, but someone would need to do A LOT of convincing to get me on their side about this.
My preference is to always annualize your appeals, and maybe annualize your campaigns. I've worked at (and with) organizations who do both. Here are reasons I like annualizing:It can be helpful for Campaigns and Appeals because you can set a Goal on the record and very easily track progress to goal in database view and in webview. Year over year reporting is easier too - just compare your FY24 Annual Giving (or whatever) campaign with your FY25 Annual Giving campaign.
I always use first date of the fiscal year, and last date of the fiscal year for the start and end, which can also create a single query point for finding “all of my FY25 appeals”. This comes in more handy than I would have thought sometimes - for instance, query any appeal with 7/1/2024 as the start date and globally mark it as inactive - but that will vary.It can actually help a lot with data integrity because users will not be able to enter a gift using one of those codes if it is outside of the date range. In database view you can configure settings for how to handle these situations, but webview just doesn't allow it. So that is something to think about, but it would never be enough to prevent me from using dates.
One of the best customer success webinars Blackbaud offered no longer appears in the “view on demand” section of their website, but I have the slide deck here: Campaigns Funds and Appeals.pdf. Hopefully you can access it!2 -
@Susan Raymer:
And given the age of the database, plus the fact that we merged with another organization that had an entirely different CFA structure, it will cause significant changes and issues with queries, etc that will take considerable time to readjust accurately.@Susan Raymer, You can't just add a HUGE monkey wrench like that at the end. LOL. Merging with another organization, and incorporating or assimilating their CFA makes things very difficult.
Nothing we say is going to change the situation. You were asked by upper management to make the change for whatever reason. Now, a conversation needs to take place. You have laid out an argument that it will cause issues with queries and reporting, and that it would be a strain on staff (hopefully you aren't a staff of one) to retrain and adjust. Hopefully there is a good relationship with management and everyone can come to a quick compromise.
There are pros and cons to each methodology. Perhaps it is time to determine with management what the best structure going forward.
2 -
@Dariel DixonHi Dariel, Thank you very much for your comments. I agree with your statements. Yes, I am the DBA will be doing all the conversion/adjustments/training of whatever the final outcome may be. It is a very complex database and has taken me a long time to get it into a very functional state of being that it has existed in now for the last few years. Sorry about the "monkey wrench."
1 -
@Karen DienerHi Karen, Thank you for your suggestions. I currently use the FY start/end dates with the start/end dates of C/F/A, always have…. The current request is to eliminate all dates and all references to FY in the names going forward. Hoping a positive discussion will result in at least getting a modification of that portion.
1 -
@Susan Raymer - yeah, I know all I did was preach to the choir. But maybe in doing so - and in sharing the document, you can convince management that annualizing campaigns and appeals is supported by many people in the industry as a best practice!
IMHO, you could lose some easy reporting ability if you do not annualize.1 -
@Karen Diener Totally agree - data integrity and ease of extraction are very key components.
0 -
@Karen Diener:
I always use first date of the fiscal year, and last date of the fiscal year for the start and end, which can also create a single query point for finding “all of my FY25 appeals”. This comes in more handy than I would have thought sometimes - for instance, query any appeal with 7/1/2024 as the start date and globally mark it as inactive - but that will vary.It can actually help a lot with data integrity because users will not be able to enter a gift using one of those codes if it is outside of the date range. In database view you can configure settings for how to handle these situations, but webview just doesn't allow it. So that is something to think about, but it would never be enough to prevent me from using dates.
One of the best customer success webinars Blackbaud offered no longer appears in the “view on demand” section of their website, but I have the slide deck here: Campaigns Funds and Appeals.pdf. Hopefully you can access it!Love this tip about the appeals! and for the record the pdf is accessible. Thanks!
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 6 Blackbaud Community Help
- 209 bbcon®
- 1.4K Blackbaud Altru®
- 394 Blackbaud Award Management™ and Blackbaud Stewardship Management™
- 1.1K Blackbaud CRM™ and Blackbaud Internet Solutions™
- 15 donorCentrics®
- 359 Blackbaud eTapestry®
- 2.5K Blackbaud Financial Edge NXT®
- 646 Blackbaud Grantmaking™
- 563 Blackbaud Education Management Solutions for Higher Education
- 3.2K Blackbaud Education Management Solutions for K-12 Schools
- 934 Blackbaud Luminate Online® and Blackbaud TeamRaiser®
- 84 JustGiving® from Blackbaud®
- 6.4K Blackbaud Raiser's Edge NXT®
- 3.7K SKY Developer
- 243 ResearchPoint™
- 118 Blackbaud Tuition Management™
- 165 Organizational Best Practices
- 238 The Tap (Just for Fun)
- 33 Blackbaud Community Challenges
- 28 PowerUp Challenges
- 3 (Open) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Product Update Briefing
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Standard Reports+
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Email Marketing
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Gift Management
- 4 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Event Management
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Home Page
- 4 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Standard Reports
- 4 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Query
- 779 Community News
- 2.9K Jobs Board
- 53 Blackbaud SKY® Reporting Announcements
- 47 Blackbaud CRM Higher Ed Product Advisory Group (HE PAG)
- 19 Blackbaud CRM Product Advisory Group (BBCRM PAG)




