Fundraising Platforms and Data Integrity
I've seen several debates on the forums about how to handle checks from organizations such as Benevity (re: who should get credit and how). I want to focus on a more discrete issue.
For those of you who hard credit the individual donors, how are you dividing and crediting the parts of the check that have little to no donor information? How do you handle an entirely anonymous donor, and how do you handle situations when you only have a name, or maybe a name and an email, and no address?
We're seeing checks here that sometimes have in excess of 100 separate donors. In addition to deciding how to apportion credit, we also have to consider that some of these gifts are meant for different funds/appeals based upon what the donors have provided in the comments. In a perfect world, I would like to make sure that everyone gets the credit they deserve and have a consistent procedure, but I am reluctant to create records for donors who may have common names and not enough identifying information to prevent them from becoming duplicates.
What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance.
For those of you who hard credit the individual donors, how are you dividing and crediting the parts of the check that have little to no donor information? How do you handle an entirely anonymous donor, and how do you handle situations when you only have a name, or maybe a name and an email, and no address?
We're seeing checks here that sometimes have in excess of 100 separate donors. In addition to deciding how to apportion credit, we also have to consider that some of these gifts are meant for different funds/appeals based upon what the donors have provided in the comments. In a perfect world, I would like to make sure that everyone gets the credit they deserve and have a consistent procedure, but I am reluctant to create records for donors who may have common names and not enough identifying information to prevent them from becoming duplicates.
What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance.
Tagged:
1
Comments
-
We receive bank transfers rather than cheques, since we're in the UK, and don't have nearly as many separate donors but this is our approach:
- For completely anonymous donors, we have an anonymous donor record.
- Where we have only a name, or a name and email, we create a record for the person with a relationship to their employer since this is on the remittance.
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 6 Blackbaud Community Help
- 209 bbcon®
- 1.4K Blackbaud Altru®
- 395 Blackbaud Award Management™ and Blackbaud Stewardship Management™
- 1.1K Blackbaud CRM™ and Blackbaud Internet Solutions™
- 15 donorCentrics®
- 359 Blackbaud eTapestry®
- 2.5K Blackbaud Financial Edge NXT®
- 646 Blackbaud Grantmaking™
- 563 Blackbaud Education Management Solutions for Higher Education
- 3.2K Blackbaud Education Management Solutions for K-12 Schools
- 934 Blackbaud Luminate Online® and Blackbaud TeamRaiser®
- 84 JustGiving® from Blackbaud®
- 6.4K Blackbaud Raiser's Edge NXT®
- 3.7K SKY Developer
- 243 ResearchPoint™
- 118 Blackbaud Tuition Management™
- 165 Organizational Best Practices
- 238 The Tap (Just for Fun)
- 33 Blackbaud Community Challenges
- 28 PowerUp Challenges
- 3 (Open) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Product Update Briefing
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Standard Reports+
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Email Marketing
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Gift Management
- 4 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Event Management
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Home Page
- 4 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Standard Reports
- 4 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Query
- 779 Community News
- 2.9K Jobs Board
- 53 Blackbaud SKY® Reporting Announcements
- 47 Blackbaud CRM Higher Ed Product Advisory Group (HE PAG)
- 19 Blackbaud CRM Product Advisory Group (BBCRM PAG)
