Donor data disposal - deleting donor data
Do you have a donor data disposal plan for your organization? In other words, do you ever delete donor's data from Raiser's Edge?
If you do, what is your criteria? 5 years with no activity? 10 years?
If you don't delete any data, do you still keep all donor's personal information in their profile such as address, email, phone numbers?
Please let me know.
Your input is much appreciated
Thank you!
Chris
Comments
-
I do not necessarily have a donor disposal plan as I believe in keeping all records if someone is a donor. I keep it all
5 -
Never delete records with gift information. Hard no for me.
Karen8 -
As much as it is tempting to purge all those old and inactive records, we do not nor have a plan to. If however I come across records with NO gift information, No appeals, No Actions etc... and the record has not been touched in quite sometime, I delete the records.5
-
Chris, yes kept at all the orgs and software platforms I've worked at/in for any records with donations.
And yes, we keep the bio/contact data. I can't think of any reason not to. If concern is data security, I would be more concerned about current, active records.
Having that data also allows you to know if Jane Doe makes a donation today and it matches on any of the points for the Jane Doe who gave 15 years ago that it should go on that record. It doesn't happen often but it does happen. Should you use a service to find deceased records, that bio info is used. I don't know of anyone who has regretted keeping 'old' donor info, even if it is not being updated. But I do know of those who've wiped address info and wished they still had it.
Just my 2 cents...5 -
We do not delete donor info, ever, unless it's a merge of duplicate records. Mark the records that have no activity (gifts, event particip, etc) inactive if you need to. It's important to keep the records for historical context.5
-
I don't believe in deleting donor records, but the question that comes up is why would you feel like this is something that needs to be done? Like Lauren Fardella mentioned, making those records inactive may take them out of rotation for reports or mailings, but there really isn't a reason to delete them.
Even more importantly, why would you purge data from these records? There is still an opportunity for a donor who you haven't heard from to still respond with a gift, and purging the data will make it difficult to determine if the gift is from the same donor or if it is a new donor. There really shouldn't be a reason to be deleting donor data that I can think of. Granted, many of these old records may be problematic in regards to data entry structures and formats, but deleting them isn't the answer.3 -
We have the tribute module - earlier this year I did a review of our tribute gifts and found 260 donors who had given one tribute gift ten or more years ago and had never given again. For over 50 of these donors, their record was marked as Do Not Contact - and many had no mailing address - just a name.
In those instances, I created new gift records on our constituent named "Cash" - added a gift note to explain the nature of the original gifts - and I deleted the original 260 constituents. We do not see any reason to hang on to a record for someone who is never going to donate to us again.
So while we do not have a disposal plan - we do intend to review tribute gifts every few years to cull out the people we believe we will not hear from again.2 -
Candace Chesler:
It sounds like these constituents should have never had a record to begin with. If sounds like these records probably didn't have enough information to create a complete record, without a mailing address and just a name. I don't understand the need for these records to be deleted. It may seem like a good idea to delete tribute donors, but what good was does this do? By deleting these donors, you remove the ability to do any type of outreach to these people. I'm about as delete-friendly as they come, but I just don't see the purpose here.
We have the tribute module - earlier this year I did a review of our tribute gifts and found 260 donors who had given one tribute gift ten or more years ago and had never given again. For over 50 of these donors, their record was marked as Do Not Contact - and many had no mailing address - just a name.
In those instances, I created new gift records on our constituent named "Cash" - added a gift note to explain the nature of the original gifts - and I deleted the original 260 constituents. We do not see any reason to hang on to a record for someone who is never going to donate to us again.
So while we do not have a disposal plan - we do intend to review tribute gifts every few years to cull out the people we believe we will not hear from again.1 -
Dariel, with the Tribute module, you need to create a record for the person being honored/memorialized. I hate it, but the system we had prior was a mess also - tributes were not consistently named in a gift attribute so you'd. need to know all the variations of an honoree or decedent's name. Someone would say "this is in honor of Rose Dixon" or "Rosie Dixon" or Rosemarie Dixon" and w/o any info tying these 3 names together, trying to run a report of all those who donated IHO/IMO was painful. Of course now we possibly get separate records in RE for the same names, but now we would run those names to see how much was given IHO/IMO that person, rather than running a gift query of all gifts with any possible combo of the name.
I do like to remove any records where it's obvious a spouse is giving every time IMO their spouse since there really is no collection of money that needs to be report to the surviving spouse/child/etc. In those cases, I put the tribute name as a gift attribute and delete the tribute record.0 -
Rose Dixon:
Dariel, with the Tribute module, you need to create a record for the person being honored/memorialized. I hate it, but the system we had prior was a mess also - tributes were not consistently named in a gift attribute so you'd. need to know all the variations of an honoree or decedent's name. Someone would say "this is in honor of Rose Dixon" or "Rosie Dixon" or Rosemarie Dixon" and w/o any info tying these 3 names together, trying to run a report of all those who donated IHO/IMO was painful. Of course now we possibly get separate records in RE for the same names, but now we would run those names to see how much was given IHO/IMO that person, rather than running a gift query of all gifts with any possible combo of the name.
I do like to remove any records where it's obvious a spouse is giving every time IMO their spouse since there really is no collection of money that needs to be report to the surviving spouse/child/etc. In those cases, I put the tribute name as a gift attribute and delete the tribute record.That makes sense Rose Dixon. Deleting duplicated tribute records only seems like good data hygiene, but that is not what we are talking about here. This is regarding deleting donor records. I just don't get the purpose. Christine Cooke bCREPro likes to point out that Bill Connors' post about to delete or not to delete. I think it might be relevant here. I just don't think that there's much gained, but the potential for a lot lost. On top of trying to determine if it's worth the time and effort.
0 -
Oh yeah, we don't ever delete donor records. I was responding to where you say you didn't understand why tribute records without donations were added. If you have the tribute module, they "must" be added (even if they have no giving) because that's how the tribute module works; it creates a record for every IHO/IMO.0
-
Rose Dixon:
Oh yeah, we don't ever delete donor records. I was responding to where you say you didn't understand why tribute records without donations were added. If you have the tribute module, they "must" be added (even if they have no giving) because that's how the tribute module works; it creates a record for every IHO/IMO.Rose Dixon I was referring to the creation of the donor record, not the tribute record. I understand that you need a tribute record that may not have gifts, but you should have a minimum amount of information to create a record; donor, tribute, or otherwise. That's what I was questioning.
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 6 Blackbaud Community Help
- 210 bbcon®
- 1.4K Blackbaud Altru®
- 395 Blackbaud Award Management™ and Blackbaud Stewardship Management™
- 1.1K Blackbaud CRM™ and Blackbaud Internet Solutions™
- 15 donorCentrics®
- 360 Blackbaud eTapestry®
- 2.5K Blackbaud Financial Edge NXT®
- 649 Blackbaud Grantmaking™
- 567 Blackbaud Education Management Solutions for Higher Education
- 3.2K Blackbaud Education Management Solutions for K-12 Schools
- 937 Blackbaud Luminate Online® and Blackbaud TeamRaiser®
- 84 JustGiving® from Blackbaud®
- 6.5K Blackbaud Raiser's Edge NXT®
- 3.7K SKY Developer
- 247 ResearchPoint™
- 119 Blackbaud Tuition Management™
- 165 Organizational Best Practices
- 239 The Tap (Just for Fun)
- 33 Blackbaud Community Challenges
- 31 PowerUp Challenges
- 3 (Open) PowerUp Challenge: Data Health
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Product Update Briefing
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Standard Reports+
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Email Marketing
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Gift Management
- 4 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Event Management
- 3 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Home Page
- 4 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Standard Reports
- 4 (Closed) Raiser's Edge NXT PowerUp Challenge: Query
- 785 Community News
- 2.9K Jobs Board
- 53 Blackbaud SKY® Reporting Announcements
- 47 Blackbaud CRM Higher Ed Product Advisory Group (HE PAG)
- 19 Blackbaud CRM Product Advisory Group (BBCRM PAG)








